The two initiatives relate to all permanent employees in the role it has already undertaken similar initiatives on the same topics. This means that should be excluded (the conditional is not random, you'll see why): retirees, they are no longer in the role. To them should be asked in part an attempt at conciliation. Also because it is not clear what period should be considered: Since 2003, year of incorporation of basic pay in IIS? Since 2006, the year of signing of the resolution and INFN Negotiable? or July 2005 or within five years of the economic prescription? Frascati, however, have already collected their signatures, so I would say to avoid trouble elsewhere to accept the signatures of pensionati.il group of Turin (I think about fifteen) pending prosecution of the Supreme Court, as announced by the Chairman during a the formal meetings on the bill should arrive in July. Albeit with low probabilities, they are still doubts as to their inclusion in or to the Policy, as far as I can not ask for time to reconcile on the increase of the volume. In any case, being part of the trade union initiative and discretion, apply the terms set out in the press that are still unclear. the group of people that many years ago did not have recourse to the second degree (I think 9 in all, some part of the Genoese in Romans). Having passed the negative sentence final, according to our lawyers and legal INFN can no longer ask for conciliation on the same subject. Place so that they can not is part of the municipality, if and when you open negotiated a "conciliation" with the INFN some re-present (as it did every time) the question in the margin. In any case for me is the suggestion already made by Luciano, or that they should instruct lawyers in Rome and Genoa (for territorial jurisdiction) in the light of new evidence indent their situation in a specific and unique. Again there is confusion because it seems that the ILO has given indication in Genoa, however, to collect these signatures. new hires (after November 2008) can not ask for reconciliation'integrazione dell'IIS in the calculation basis for the simple fact that they are not yet subscribed to this Polizza.Tutto said that the attempt should be considered mandatory Conciliation allows some margin of error and that their positions after being analyzed one by one can be separated from any treaty or agreement by the subsequent right of appeal where instead the positions to be determined and reported accurately.
2. What happens to colleagues on vacation / sick / mission that can not join by July 9? We may collect the membership by mail / fax?
Applications for membership may NOT be accepted via mail or fax, in that it deals with real powers of attorney should be the signature on the registration form. You are thinking of an extension of time until September to allow the recovery of personnel referred to above.
3. What happens if you are not used?
Absolutely nothing. Those who decide to join the initiative can not independently contact a lawyer of his choice which will prepare the documents within the time limits, according to our interpretation expire in May 2011 (5 years from the date of the resolution of the INFN May 26, 2006) , as interpreted by CISL before.
0 comments:
Post a Comment